|
California Expert Software
Truth is Everything |
|
||
![]()
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
The Bandit and his gang are great believers in watershed events, such as the Second Coming. Maybe there's something to those imaginings, as the recent Washington Post/ABC poll shows. The Bandit is definitely not a popular guy, as we learned last week from a WSJ/NBC poll.
This morning's
WSJ also
encourages some thoughts about Judgement Day, as the US
economy actually grew more slowly than previously reported. Oil prices
are at record highs, so the Pentagon anal-retentives are
forced to let go hoarded oil. In a follow-up report,
WSJ said "Recovery
Bypasses Many Americans." Not everyone is saved ... |
I concentrate on the follow-up report, because the weakest link of a chain is the most reliable indicator of future performance.

As the above chart (reprinted from WSJ) shows, GDP growth steadily declined during Reagan-Bush, hitting bottom in the election year of 1992. The Clinton Administration was able to encourage solid growth almost every year of its reign. The bottom dripped out as soon as the Bandit took over, although the last year does look as good as a Clinton year. Bandit policies haven't made things better for most men, although women did a little better for a while. Poor people have seen their circumstances get worse and worse. All this implies what we've pointed out before, and is repeated in the WSJ article: "... The share of all income going to the top fifth of households rose slightly to 50.1% last year, matching the 2001 high and well above the 45.2% reported in 1984 ..."
Who benefits from this economy? The top 20%. Everyone else is slowing twisting in the wind.
Americans are not too swift, but it does appear they are discovering their plight at last. I hope so, in which case Judgement Day may not be far off. The first trumpet might blow November 8, 2005.
From the Wall St Journal ...
| Recovery Bypasses Many
Americans
Despite Economic Growth, Median Household Income And Wages Fell Last
Year
By
ROBERT GUY
MATTHEWS
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL August 31, 2005; Page A2
WASHINGTON --
Although the U.S. economy grew robustly last year, the income of the
median household slipped a bit, wages of full-time workers fell, the
number of Americans living below the poverty line rose and more
Americans went without health insurance, the Census Bureau said in its
annual report on consumer income.
The snapshot suggests that the recovering economy, while adding jobs and showing productivity gains since the recession of 2001, isn't paying dividends to everyone. The economy grew by a healthy 3.8% in 2004, but the new Census Bureau report underscores that one unusual feature of the recovery has been sluggish gains in income for many, particularly at the bottom and middle. The share of all income going to the top fifth of households rose slightly to 50.1% last year, matching the 2001 high and well above the 45.2% reported in 1984, the bureau said. (See the full text of the report.) "Recoveries have taken longer and longer to reach working families," said Jared Bernstein, economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal think tank in Washington. "What's out there to lift workers' bargaining power right now? It is not the unions, minimum wage, trade or offshoring," he said. "Practically every important economic phenomenon has tilted against workers and favored investors." "It takes several years to recover from a recession," said Ron Haskins, a former Bush administration official now at the Brookings Institution in Washington. "[The] report paints a broad picture of stagnant or slightly declining income and modestly increasing poverty rates since the 2001 recession," he said, though adding that incomes of families at the middle are substantially higher than they were a decade ago. "Although child poverty is still substantially lower than before the economic boom of the 1990s, children and families, especially at the bottom of the income distribution, continue to lose ground," he said. Median household income -- the level at which half the households have more and half have less income -- was $44,389, down 0.21% from 2003 after adjusting for inflation, a change the Census Bureau said wasn't statistically significant. Income was 3.8% below the 1999 peak. Median income fell most sharply in the Midwest, where it dropped 2.8% to $44,700, though it remains $300 higher than the national average. The drop -- accompanied by a rise in poverty in the Midwest -- partly reflects the disappearance of high-wage manufacturing jobs. Across the country, the Census Bureau said, median earnings for full-time workers employed year-round dropped significantly last year. Men's earnings declined by 2.3% to $40,798 and women's 1.0% to $31,223. The data, which don't reflect employer-provided health benefits, measure pretax income. The fraction of Americans living below the official poverty line -- $19,307 for a family of four last year -- rose for the fourth consecutive year to 12.7% in 2004 from 12.5% the year before, the bureau said. Last year, 37 million Americans were living in poverty, about 1 million more than the year before and 5.4 million more than in 2000 when poverty bottomed out as the economy peaked. The poverty rate rose for non-Hispanic whites -- to 8.6% from 8.2% the year before -- while falling among Asians to 9.8% in 2003 from 11.8%. Among blacks and Hispanics, there wasn't any significant change, the Census Bureau said. The biggest increase was among people between the ages of 18 and 64, rising to 11.3% from 10.8%. Among those 65 and over, the poverty rate fell to 9.8% from 10.2%. The Census Bureau poverty data don't reflect non-cash government benefits, such as health insurance or food stamps. The Census Bureau also said that the percentage of Americans without health insurance remained stable at 15.7% in 2004. The number lacking insurance increased by 800,000 to 45.8 million while the number with public or private health insurance increased by two million to 245.3 million. A slightly smaller percentage of Americans -- 59.8% last year -- got health insurance from their employers, while a rising fraction of Americans were covered by government health-insurance programs, particularly the state-federal Medicaid program. While liberal-leaning analysts seized on the data as evidence that the government needs to do more to spread health insurance to those who lack it, conservatives were quick to fire back. "Being uninsured in America is largely a matter of choice," said Devon Herrick of the National Center for Policy Analysis, a conservative think tank with offices in Dallas and Washington. "The greatest and growing problem of the uninsured is among those families who can afford health insurance," but choose not to pay for it. The Census Bureau yesterday also released results of its American Community Survey, which tracks state and local trends. Among the highlights:
- In counties with populations above 250,000, three of the five areas reporting the lowest median income levels are along the Texas/Mexico border: Hidalgo County, Texas, with a median income of $24,800, was ranked last. - Among places with populations of one million or more, Philadelphia had the sharpest drop, 9.5%, in median household income. It fell to $30,600 from $33,800 a year earlier. - Median earnings for men are highest in legal occupations, and for women are highest in computer and mathematical occupations.
Write to Robert Guy Matthews at
robertguy.matthews@wsj.com
|
![]()
WalterB -
10:32:31 - Wednesday, 08/31/2005
![]()
Last update: 11/13/2007
![]()
© Copyright California Expert Software 2007
All rights reserved.